The 2026 DEI Executive Order recently issued by the White House imposes new obligations on federal contractors and subcontractors, to prevent “artificial” and “unnecessary” DEI program costs from being passed on to the government in federal courts. It limits the definition of racially discriminatory DEI activities to employment decisions, contracting activities such as vendor agreements
Fair is Foul: Inside the EEOC’s Sweeping Subpoena in the Nike DEI Pattern or Practice Discrimination Investigation—and What Employers Should Know
This is not the macabre tale of Macbeth. It is the new legal reality. The EEOC’s sweeping subpoena to Nike signals a dramatic change in EEOC enforcement posture toward Diversity, Equity & Inclusion programs previously regarded as permissible, a shift that demands careful navigation by employers.
Executive Agencies Confirm Demise of OFCCP and Identify Private Sector Enforcement Targets
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Department of Labor released their 2026 Congressional Budget Justifications (CBJ) on May 30, 2025, providing valuable information related to the EEOC’s enforcement intentions and the future of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP). A CBJ is the annual budget justification materials of a federal agency or a component of a federal agency that are submitted in conjunction with the President’s annual budget submission. The CBJ provides a detailed description of each program and information about how the agency will use funds, including increases and decreases in spending. The EEOC CBJ identifies four enforcement priorities and anticipated investigations into systemic intentional discrimination using the pattern or practice method of proof. Additionally, the EEOC CBJ and the Department of Labor’s Budget in Brief confirm that the OFCCP will be extinguished with its remaining two programs distributed to the EEOC and the Veterans Employment Training Service.
Seventh Circuit Upholds Exclusion of Pregnant Workers from Temporary Alternative Duty Policy
In a recent decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that an employer did not violate the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) despite excluding pregnant workers from its “Temporary Alternative Duty” (TAD) policy. In the process, the Seventh Circuit provided valuable guidance related to an employer’s burden of production in pregnancy discrimination litigation and the propriety of exclusionary TAD policies.
COVID-19 Employment Accommodations: Three Tips for Adapting to Circumstances
On Tuesday, April 19, the American Bar Association’s Labor and Employment Law Section hosted the panel “Navigating the New Normal: Accommodations in the Pandemic Era.” The panel members were Alex Breland of CDK Global in Chicago, IL; Pamela Devi Chandran of the Washington State Nurses Association in Seattle, WA; and Jackie Gessner of Barnes & Thornburg LLP in Indianapolis, IN. Carolyn Wheeler of Katz, Marshall, & Banks LLP in Washington, DC served as moderator. Their consensus was that, although vaccines have (thankfully) lowered Covid-19 infection and death rates, workplace challenges related to Covid have not gone away. They have only changed.